The Album Years, a new music podcast by No-Man colleagues Steven Wilson and Tim Bowness, went off to a roaring start, with fans applauding the first two episodes. The new series even hit the top 3 on Apple Podcasts in various countries.
My opinion? The enthusiasm and insights of Wilson and Bowness make you want to pick up a pencil and take extensive notes. I’m afraid this series is going to cost me a small fortune in record stores. If a music podcast can achieve that, it’s a success in my book.
Each episode zooms in on a particular ‘album year’, a year from an era where albums existed as a unified art form, not just a random collection of hits. For Wilson and Bowness, who grew up in the 70’s and 80’s, the era started in the mid-60’s–which is true, as long as you don’t take jazz albums into account–and ‘ended’ around the year 2000, which seems to be a more arbitrary choice, especially since the album era never really ended. But you need to draw the line somewhere. I get that.
Beyond Bowie and Pink Floyd
The first two episodes, focussing on 1980 and 1973, where lots of fun already. Without spoiling anything, I can say that while ‘Closer’ by Joy Division, Bowie’s ’Scary Monsters’ and Pink Floyd’s ’The Dark Side of the Moon’ are briefly mentioned they don’t feature in the official selection. As Wilson rightfully comments, these albums have been dissected and reconstructed over and over already: “There’s nothing more to say.”
Instead, Wilson and Bowness pick favorite, significant and strangely-under-the-radar records of a particular year and reflect on it, placing the albums in their historical context, commenting on sonic innovations, adding personal recollections and funny ad-libs (like only friends can), talking about the influence and nachleben of certain albums, often connecting the dots between them. It’s history, debate and annotated playlist rolled into one.
They don’t always agree, which is the kind of dynamic you need to make a podcast like this interesting. Even more so as the podcast isn’t allowed to use any sound clips, so both hosts have to work extra hard to ‘dance about architecture’ and they’re magnificent at it.
Wilson talks quite quickly and in a confident voice (almost as if his knowledge and opinions are fighting to get out), at times cutting off the soft-spoken Tim Bowness mid-sentence.
The latter chooses his words with great care and manages to keep his composure when Wilson questions his choices or statements. It really makes you want to be a fly on the wall during No-Man recording sessions, which have consistently spawned great albums. Maybe that’s their magic.
But both offer remarkable insights and analysis. Even when they talk about records you already know, you’ll be inclined to dig up that LP and listen to it with a new pair of ears.
Just to give you one example: in the 1973 episode, Wilson talks about the horrific drum sound on Todd Rundgren’s ‘A Wizard, A True Star’. So I went back to the Zen Archer, and lo and behold, he’s right. Though one could argue it’s part of the DIY aesthetic of the album.
Insightful and exciting
There’s really no point in judging the selection of albums. Wilson and Bowness have been sharing their playlists online for years. Together they turned me on to dozens of albums. They set out the boundaries of the podcast clearly and within that framework I’m confident they’ll keep balancing every episode between the familiar and the obscure, the accessible and the bizarre. The Album Years has been both insightful and exciting so far.
Enjoy ’The Album Years’ now on all major podcast platforms.
A wonderful exposure of lesser known or underrated albums. Ive listed currently around 60 or so albums that I havent got…jeez. STOP RIGHT NOW. The chit chat between the two is great and they compliment each other very well. I pride myself in my own musical knowledge, but I realise now that I know very little. Only complaint is that I wish Mr Steven Wilson would slow down talking a bit…..I realise its a case of fitting in alot of material, or as much as possible I suppose, but i find myself having to keep rewinding to make notes of album title etc. But Thanbkyou.
LikeLiked by 1 person
What is Steven Wilson’s personal beef with Genesis? Every other artist mentioned on the podcast he will give an opinion or point of view on the artist and the music, whether positive or negative. But with Genesis he seems to refuse to even comment and would apparently prefer if they were not mentioned at all. What’s the story?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hi Jonny. I think that’s a valid point, though I should probably relisten some episodes. Yesterday I listened to the 1974 episode. And indeed, no comment whatsoever when The Lamb was mentioned. He left it all to Tim. I was expecting a mention of Back In NYC, which has a grand sound and proto punk vibe to me. It is an album that will elicit a strong opinion most of the times. Two options for me: (1) Maybe the Genesis catalogue is considered too well-known (canon, it’s arguable) or (2) Steven had an opinion which was edited out to make some space for albums he likes better or finds more interesting to talk about. He’s clearly admiring Peter Gabriel and once played live with Steven Hacket. I don’t think he’s consciously refusing to comment, but still, good point!
LikeLiked by 1 person